Discussion: Bayesian Methods: Applied? Yes. Philosophical Defense? In Flux

DOI10.1080/00031305.2012.752410OpenAlexW2164775399WikidataQ58253801 ScholiaQ58253801MaRDI QIDQ5877098

Deborah G. Mayo

Publication date: 3 February 2023

Published in: The American Statistician (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2012.752410

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistics (62-XX)

Uses Software

• BayesDA

Cites Work

• Philosophy of statistics.
• Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman have agreed on testing? (With comments and a rejoinder).
• The Selection of Prior Distributions by Formal Rules
• Principles of Statistical Inference
• Severe Testing as a Basic Concept in a Neyman–Pearson Philosophy of Induction
• “Not Only Defended But Also Applied”: The Perceived Absurdity of Bayesian Inference
• Rejoinder: ``The case for objective Bayesian analysis
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item