Infeasibility Of Super-Efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis Models
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5888097
DOI10.1080/03155986.1999.11732379OpenAlexW2267298282MaRDI QIDQ5888097
Publication date: 21 April 2023
Published in: INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03155986.1999.11732379
Related Items
Evaluating NBA player performance using bounded integer data envelopment analysis ⋮ Assessing bids of Greek public organizations service providers using data envelopment analysis ⋮ Modified super-efficiency DEA models for solving infeasibility under non-negative data set ⋮ Sensitivity and stability analysis in DEA with bounded uncertainty ⋮ Measuring super-efficiency in DEA in the presence of infeasibility ⋮ Multi-period additive efficiency measurement in data envelopment analysis with non-positive and undesirable data ⋮ Trajectories of efficiency measurement: a bibliometric analysis of DEA and SFA ⋮ Frontier-based incentive mechanisms for allocating common revenues or fixed costs ⋮ A new approach to rank the decision making units in presence of infeasibility in intuitionistic fuzzy environment ⋮ Sensitivity analysis of efficient units in the presence of non-discretionary inputs ⋮ Hedge fund performance appraisal using data envelopment analysis ⋮ An interactive benchmark model ranking performers - application to financial holding companies ⋮ Ranking all DEA-efficient DMUs based on cross efficiency and analytic hierarchy process methods ⋮ A ratio-based method for ranking production units in profit efficiency measurement ⋮ A new DEA ranking system based on changing the reference set ⋮ A super-efficiency model for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis ⋮ Ranking efficient decision making units in data envelopment analysis based on reference frontier share ⋮ A nonparametric framework to detect outliers in estimating production frontiers ⋮ Theory and statistical properties of quantile data envelopment analysis ⋮ An effective transformation in ranking using \(l_{1}\)-norm in data envelopment analysis ⋮ A DEA‐based method of allocating the fixed cost as a complement to the original input ⋮ Selecting slacks-based data envelopment analysis models ⋮ Super-efficiency DEA in the presence of infeasibility: one model approach ⋮ Super-efficiency infeasibility and zero data in DEA ⋮ Ranking efficient dmus using the Tchebycheff norm ⋮ Exploring the efficiency and effectiveness in global e-retailing companies ⋮ Super efficiency evaluations based on potential slack ⋮ The super-efficiency procedure for outlier identification, not for ranking efficient units ⋮ Additive super-efficiency in integer-valued data envelopment analysis ⋮ Using the gradient line for ranking DMUs in DEA. ⋮ European Energy Efficiency Evaluation Based on the Use of Super-Efficiency Under Undesirable Outputs in SBM Models ⋮ Using Monte Carlo method for ranking interval data ⋮ A metafrontier-based yardstick competition mechanism for incentivising units in centrally managed multi-group organisations ⋮ A modified Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index: assessing environmental productivity performance in China ⋮ Data envelopment analysis (DEA) -- thirty years on ⋮ Selecting most efficient information system projects in presence of user subjective opinions: a DEA approach ⋮ The impact of tourist destination on hotel efficiency: a data envelopment analysis approach ⋮ Ranking decision making units by imposing a minimum weight restriction in the data envelopment analysis ⋮ Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the weight restriction approach ⋮ Super efficiency evaluation using a common platform on a cooperative game ⋮ A DEA-based incentives system for centrally managed multi-unit organisations ⋮ Super-efficiency infeasibility in the presence of nonradial measurement ⋮ Prioritization method for frontier DMUs: A slack-based measure ⋮ A note on DEA vs principal component analysis: An improvement to Joe Zhu's approach ⋮ Super-efficiency in stochastic data envelopment analysis: an input relaxation approach ⋮ A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis: a comment ⋮ A modified super-efficiency measure based on simultaneous input-output projection in data envelopment analysis ⋮ Ranking DMUs by \(l_1\)-norm with fuzzy data in DEA ⋮ Evaluation of deregulated airline networks using data envelopment analysis combined with principal component analysis with an application to Western Europe ⋮ A ranking method based on a full-inefficient frontier ⋮ How the great recession affects performance: a case of Pennsylvania hospitals using DEA ⋮ An extension on super slacks-based measure DEA approach ⋮ Fixed input allocation methods based on super CCR efficiency invariance and practical feasibility ⋮ Robustness of efficiency scores in data envelopment analysis with interval scale data ⋮ An integrated performance evaluation of financial holding companies in Taiwan ⋮ The curse of dimensionality of decision-making units: a simple approach to increase the discriminatory power of data envelopment analysis ⋮ Resolving the infeasibility of the super-efficiency DEA based on DDF ⋮ Ranking using \(l_{1}\)-norm in data envelopment analysis ⋮ Integrated dynamic interval data envelopment analysis in the presence of integer and negative data ⋮ Employing super-efficiency analysis as an alternative to DEA: an application in outpatient substance abuse treatment ⋮ The role of hyperplanes for characterizing suspicious units in DEA ⋮ Super-efficiency and DEA sensitivity analysis ⋮ Sensitivity and stability analysis in DEA ⋮ A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis ⋮ Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context ⋮ Nested frontier-based best practice regulation under asymmetric information in a principal-agent framework ⋮ A two-stage improved base point slacks-based measure of super-efficiency for negative data handling ⋮ Information systems project prioritization using data envelopment analysis ⋮ Efficiency evaluation with strong ordinal input and output measures
