A Composite Indicator Methodology to Rank National Olympic Committees
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5888388
DOI10.1142/S021759592250035XMaRDI QIDQ5888388
No author found.
Publication date: 25 April 2023
Published in: Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
acceptability analysissatisfaction indexOlympics rankingpreferential differencepreferential priority
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Performance evaluation of participating nations at the 2012 London Summer Olympics by a two-stage data envelopment analysis
- Mean value and volume-based sensitivity analysis for Olympic rankings
- Achievement and benchmarking of countries at the Summer Olympics using cross efficiency evaluation method
- Measuring customer satisfaction using a collective preference disaggregation model
- Olympic ranking based on a zero sum gains DEA model.
- The medal points' incenter for rankings in sport
- Performance benchmarking of achievements in the Olympics: an application of data envelopment analysis with restricted multipliers
- Measuring Olympics achievements based on a parallel DEA approach
- Aggregation of utility-based individual preferences for group decision-making
- Towards fair ranking of olympics achievements: the case of Sydney 2000
- The average Spearman rank correlation coefficient
- Measuring Olympics performance based on a distance-based approach
- Measuring the performance of nations at the Olympic Games using DEA models with different preferences
- SMAA-2: Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis for Group Decision Making
- Decision Quality Using Ranked Attribute Weights
- Measuring the performance of nations at the Summer Olympics using data envelopment analysis
- Measuring Olympics Achievements via Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis
- JSMAA: open source software for SMAA computations
- Olympic rankings based on objective weighting schemes
This page was built for publication: A Composite Indicator Methodology to Rank National Olympic Committees
