Can we distinguish SUSY breaking terms between weakly and strongly coupled heterotic string theories?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5935219
DOI10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00416-6zbMath0977.81117arXivhep-ph/0012038OpenAlexW3098299368WikidataQ126812537 ScholiaQ126812537MaRDI QIDQ5935219
No author found.
Publication date: 20 June 2001
Published in: Physics Letters. B (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0012038
Supersymmetric field theories in quantum mechanics (81T60) String and superstring theories; other extended objects (e.g., branes) in quantum field theory (81T30)
Cites Work
- String unification, universal one-loop corrections and strongly coupled heterotic string theory
- Four-dimensional M-theory and supersymmetry breaking
- Gaugino condensation, moduli potential and supersymmetry breaking in M-theory models
- Supersymmetry breakdown at a hidden wall
- On the four-dimensional effective action of strongly coupled heterotic string theory.
- Heterotic M-theory in five dimensions
- Five-dimensional gauged supergravity and supersymmetry breaking in M-theory
- Supergravity and supersymmetry breaking in four and five dimensions
- Renormalisation invariance and the soft \(\beta\)-functions.
- Strong coupling expansion of Calabi-Yau compactification
- Couplings and scales in strongly coupled heterotic string theory
- Electroweak symmetry breaking and \(s\)-spectrum in M-theory.
This page was built for publication: Can we distinguish SUSY breaking terms between weakly and strongly coupled heterotic string theories?
