Deprecated: $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=false is deprecated, set $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=true, $wgMWOAuthSharedUserSource='local' instead [Called from MediaWiki\HookContainer\HookContainer::run in /var/www/html/w/includes/HookContainer/HookContainer.php at line 135] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372
Some nasty reflexive groups - MaRDI portal

Some nasty reflexive groups

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5947799

DOI10.1007/PL00004879zbMATH Open0988.20044arXivmath/0003164OpenAlexW2146511592MaRDI QIDQ5947799

Saharon Shelah, Rüdiger Göbel

Publication date: 22 October 2001

Published in: Mathematische Zeitschrift (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: In "Almost Free Modules, Set-theoretic Methods", Eklof and Mekler raised the question about the existence of dual abelian groups G which are not isomorphic to Z+G. Recall that G is a dual group if G ~ D^* for some group D with D^*=Hom(D,Z). The existence of such groups is not obvious because dual groups are subgroups of cartesian products Z^D and therefore have very many homomorphisms into Z. If p is such a homomorphism arising from a projection of the cartesian product, then D^* ~ ker(p)+Z. In all `classical cases' of groups D of infinite rank it turns out that D^* ~ ker(p). Is this always the case? Also note that reflexive groups G in the sense of H.Bass are dual groups because by definition the evaluation map s:G-->G^{**} is an isomorphism, hence G is the dual of G^*. Assuming the diamond axiom for aleph_1 we construct a reflexive torsion-free abelian group of cardinality aleph_1 which is not isomorphic to Z+G. The result is formulated for modules over countable principal ideal domains which are not field.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0003164






Related Items (3)






This page was built for publication: Some nasty reflexive groups

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5947799)