Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification

DOI10.1016/S0004-3702(01)00145-XzbMath0984.68154OpenAlexW2020955676MaRDI QIDQ5958397

John L. Pollock

Publication date: 3 March 2002

Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(01)00145-x

zbMATH Keywords

reasoningdefeasibledefeatjustificationnonmonotonic

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)

Related Items (21)

A logic programming framework for possibilistic argumentation: Formalization and logical properties ⋮ Argumentation through a distributed self-stabilizing approach ⋮ Philosophical reflections on argument strength and gradual acceptability ⋮ A Bayesian approach to informal argument fallacies ⋮ Rethinking specificity in defeasible reasoning and its effect in argument reinstatement ⋮ CONCILIATORY REASONING, SELF-DEFEAT, AND ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION ⋮ Weakest link in formal argumentation: lookahead and principle-based analysis ⋮ On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks ⋮ Evaluating dialectical structures with Bayesian methods ⋮ SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics ⋮ Self-stabilizing defeat status computation: dealing with conflict management in multi-agent systems ⋮ On degrees of justification ⋮ Inductive inference and argumentation methods in modern intelligent decision support systems ⋮ Uses and computation of imprecise probabilities from statistical data and expert arguments ⋮ Pollock and Sturgeon on defeaters ⋮ The logicist manifesto: At long last let logic-based artificial intelligence become a field unto itself ⋮ Formalizing argumentative reasoning in a possibilistic logic programming setting with fuzzy unification ⋮ Semantics for a theory of defeasible reasoning ⋮ Towards Context Sensitive Defeasible Rules ⋮ TOWARD A COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF PROBABILISTIC ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS ⋮ On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems

Cites Work

• A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
• A logical framework for default reasoning
• Nonmonotonic logic and temporal projection
• A logic for default reasoning
• The logical foundations of statistical inference
• The logical foundations of goal-regression planning in autonomous agents
• Justification and defeat
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Floating conclusions and zombie paths: Two deep difficulties in the ``directly skeptical approach to defeasible inheritance nets
• On the Foundations of Statistical Inference
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification