Does it make sense to be an ``objective Bayesian? (Comment on articles by Berger and by Goldstein)

DOI10.1214/06-BA116CzbMath1331.62046OpenAlexW1509400797MaRDI QIDQ5965268

Stephen E. Fienberg

Publication date: 2 March 2016

Published in: Bayesian Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ba/1340371039

zbMATH Keywords

Dutch bookholy grailnormative theorysubjective likelihood

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Bayesian inference (62F15) Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01)

Related Items (4)

When should modes of inference disagree? Some simple but challenging examples ⋮ Bayesian models and methods in public policy and government settings ⋮ Discussion of: ``Bayesian models and methods in public policy and government settings by S.E. Fienberg ⋮ Comment: Bayesian Ideas Reemerged in the 1950s

This page was built for publication: Does it make sense to be an ``objective Bayesian? (Comment on articles by Berger and by Goldstein)