How misleading is linearization? Evaluating the dynamics of the neoclassical growth model
From MaRDI portal
Publication:602848
DOI10.1016/j.jedc.2010.06.013zbMath1231.91322OpenAlexW3125022878MaRDI QIDQ602848
Manoj Atolia, Stephen J. Turnovsky, Santanu Chatterjee
Publication date: 5 November 2010
Published in: Journal of Economic Dynamics \& Control (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://coss.fsu.edu/econpapers/wpaper/wp2008_11_01.pdf
Related Items (4)
Migrant network effect and economic development ⋮ Growth and inequality: dependence on the time path of productivity increases (and other structural changes) ⋮ Linearization and higher-order approximations: How good are they? Results from an endogeneous growth model with public capital ⋮ SIZE AND COMPOSITION OF PUBLIC SPENDING IN A NEOCLASSICAL GROWTH MODEL
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Smart forward shooting
- Capital utilization, economic growth and convergence
- Comparing solution methods for dynamic equilibrium economies
- Reverse shooting made easy: Automating the search for the global nonlinear saddle path
- Projection methods for solving aggregate growth models
- Algorithms and economic dynamics. Selected papers from the 2nd annual meeting of the Society for Computational Economics, Geneva, Switzerland, 1996
- Intertemporal and intratemporal substitution, and the speed of convergence in the neoclassical growth model.
- Convergence in a two-sector nonscale growth model
- Comparing accuracy of second-order approximation and dynamic programming
- Accuracy in Simulations
- Accuracy of Numerical Solutions Using the Euler Equation Residuals
- Growth Empirics: A Panel Data Approach
- Reopening the convergence debate: A new look at cross-country growth empirics.
- Solution of perfect foresight saddlepoint problems: a simple method and applications.
- A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth
This page was built for publication: How misleading is linearization? Evaluating the dynamics of the neoclassical growth model
