An empirical and axiomatic comparison of ranking-based semantics for abstract argumentation

DOI10.1080/11663081.2023.2246863MaRDI QIDQ6056713

Elise Bonzon, Nicolas Maudet, Jérôme Delobelle, Sébastien Konieczny

Publication date: 30 October 2023

Published in: Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

comparisonargumentationranking-based semantics

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Mathematical logic and foundations (03-XX)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• From fine-grained properties to broad principles for gradual argumentation: a principled spectrum
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation
• A lattice-theoretical fixpoint theorem and its applications
• A Game-Theoretic Measure of Argument Strength for Abstract Argumentation
• On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
• A Parametrized Ranking-Based Semantics for Persuasion
• Extending Social Abstract Argumentation with Votes on Attacks
• A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION
• A logic-based theory of deductive arguments

This page was built for publication: An empirical and axiomatic comparison of ranking-based semantics for abstract argumentation