Pairwise comparisons or constrained optimization? A usability evaluation of techniques for eliciting decision priorities

DOI10.1111/itor.12907OpenAlexW3105878832MaRDI QIDQ6060653

Edward Abel, Norman William Paton, John A. Keane, Unnamed Author

Publication date: 29 November 2023

Published in: International Transactions in Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12907

zbMATH Keywords

constrained optimizationpairwise comparisonusabilityexperimental evaluationdecision-making methoduser preference elicitation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Operations research, mathematical programming (90-XX)

Related Items (1)

Analyzing anchoring bias in attribute weight elicitation of SMART, Swing, and best‐worst method

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Capturing decision maker preference: Experimental comparison of decision analysis and MCDM techniques
• Are incomplete and self-confident preference relations better in multicriteria decision making? A simulation-based investigation
• Linear programming. Foundations and extensions.
• A Problem-based Selection of Multi-attribute Decision-making Methods
• An Experimental Evaluation of Interactive MCDM Methods and the Decision Making Process
• The Effectiveness of Alternative Preference Elicitation Methods in the Analytic Hierarchy Process
• Comparison between multiple-choice and analytic hierarchy process: measuring human perception
• Measurement and preference function modelling
• AHP and multichoice goal programming integration for course planning
• PriEsT: an interactive decision support tool to estimate priorities from pairwise comparison judgments

This page was built for publication: Pairwise comparisons or constrained optimization? A usability evaluation of techniques for eliciting decision priorities