Pairwise comparisons or constrained optimization? A usability evaluation of techniques for eliciting decision priorities
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6060653
DOI10.1111/itor.12907OpenAlexW3105878832MaRDI QIDQ6060653
Edward Abel, Norman William Paton, John A. Keane, Unnamed Author
Publication date: 29 November 2023
Published in: International Transactions in Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12907
constrained optimizationpairwise comparisonusabilityexperimental evaluationdecision-making methoduser preference elicitation
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Capturing decision maker preference: Experimental comparison of decision analysis and MCDM techniques
- Are incomplete and self-confident preference relations better in multicriteria decision making? A simulation-based investigation
- Linear programming. Foundations and extensions.
- A Problem-based Selection of Multi-attribute Decision-making Methods
- An Experimental Evaluation of Interactive MCDM Methods and the Decision Making Process
- The Effectiveness of Alternative Preference Elicitation Methods in the Analytic Hierarchy Process
- Comparison between multiple-choice and analytic hierarchy process: measuring human perception
- Measurement and preference function modelling
- AHP and multichoice goal programming integration for course planning
- PriEsT: an interactive decision support tool to estimate priorities from pairwise comparison judgments
This page was built for publication: Pairwise comparisons or constrained optimization? A usability evaluation of techniques for eliciting decision priorities