A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semantics: claim-defeat, principles, and expressiveness

DOI10.1016/j.artint.2023.104011OpenAlexW4386517816MaRDI QIDQ6066787

Stefan Woltran, Anna Rapberger, Wolfgang Dvořák

Publication date: 16 November 2023

Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2023.104011

zbMATH Keywords

expressivenessargumentation semanticsprinciple-based analysisclaim-augmented argumentation frameworksclaim-based reasoning

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Artificial neural networks and deep learning (68T07) Semantics in the theory of computing (68Q55)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
• Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
• Complexity of abstract argumentation under a claim-centric view
• Characteristics of multiple viewpoints in abstract argumentation
• On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
• Argumentation in artificial intelligence
• On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
• A logic for default reasoning
• On the partial semantics for disjunctive deductive databases
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Complete extensions in argumentation coincide with 3-valued stable models in logic programming
• Connecting fuzzy logic and argumentation frames via logical attack principles
• On the equivalence between logic programming semantics and argumentation semantics
• Floating conclusions and zombie paths: Two deep difficulties in the ``directly skeptical approach to defeasible inheritance nets
• The refinement extension principle for semantics of dynamic logic programming
• Semi-stable semantics
• Persuasion and Value in Legal Argument
• Change in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Adding an Argument
• Deterministic and non-deterministic stable models
• Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
• On the Relation Between Claim-Augmented Argumentation Frameworks and Collective Attacks
• Enhancing Statement Evaluation in Argumentation via Multi-labelling Systems
• On the Expressive Power of Collective Attacks
• A Generalization of Dung’s Abstract Framework for Argumentation: Arguing with Sets of Attacking Arguments
• Skepticism and floating conclusions
• The complexity landscape of claim-augmented argumentation frameworks

This page was built for publication: A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semantics: claim-defeat, principles, and expressiveness