Comparisons of a multi-regional trial for four or five regions by fixed effect model and random effect model about allocating sample size rationally into individual regions for a multi-regional trial
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6067486
DOI10.1080/03610926.2022.2065019OpenAlexW4223942397MaRDI QIDQ6067486
Publication date: 17 November 2023
Published in: Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2022.2065019
Cites Work
- Comparisons of allocating sample size rationally into individual regions under heterogeneous effect size in a multiregional trial by a fixed effect model and a random effect model
- A Design For Survival Studies: A Multi-regional Trial With Unrecognized Heterogeneity
- A Statistical Issue About a Phase III Multi-regional Trial for the Survival Data under Accelerated Failure Time Model with Unrecognized Heterogeneity
- Approaches to Allocate Sample Size Rationally Into Individual Regions for a Multi-regional Trial Under Heterogeneous Effect Size
- Sample Size Requirements for Evaluation of Bridging Evidence
- An Approach to Determine Sample Size and to Allocate Sample Size for a Specific Region in a Multiregional Trial for Survival (Time-to-Event) Data under Accelerated Failure Time Model
- Sample Size Determination and Rational Partition for A Multi- Regional Trial for Survival (Time-To-Event) Data with Unrecognized Heterogeneity that Interacts with Treatment
This page was built for publication: Comparisons of a multi-regional trial for four or five regions by fixed effect model and random effect model about allocating sample size rationally into individual regions for a multi-regional trial
