Causal inference in case of near‐violation of positivity: comparison of methods

DOI10.1002/bimj.202000323zbMath1523.62147OpenAlexW4205454105WikidataQ130420541 ScholiaQ130420541MaRDI QIDQ6068866

Y. Foucher, Unnamed Author, Unnamed Author, Unnamed Author, Unnamed Author, Unnamed Author

Publication date: 15 December 2023

Published in: Biometrical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.202000323

zbMATH Keywords

positivitysimulationscausal inferencedoubly robust estimatorspropensity scoreg-computationreal-world evidence

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Doubly Robust Estimation in Missing Data and Causal Inference Models
• Demystifying double robustness: a comparison of alternative strategies for estimating a population mean from incomplete data
• G-computation estimation for causal inference with complex longitudinal data
• Why prefer double robust estimators in causal inference?
• Unified methods for censored longitudinal data and causality
• A New Criterion for Confounder Selection
• Propensity scores: From naïve enthusiasm to intuitive understanding
• Dealing with limited overlap in estimation of average treatment effects
• The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
• Balancing Covariates via Propensity Score Weighting
• A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect
• Propensity scores based methods for estimating average treatment effect and average treatment effect among treated: A comparative study

This page was built for publication: Causal inference in case of near‐violation of positivity: comparison of methods