Are Euclid’s Diagrams ‘Representations’? On an Argument by Ken Manders

DOI10.1007/978-3-030-95201-3_7zbMath1519.01009OpenAlexW4285292164MaRDI QIDQ6098765

David Waszek

Publication date: 14 June 2023

Published in: Annals of the Canadian Society for History and Philosophy of Mathematics/ Société canadienne d’histoire et de philosophie des mathématiques (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95201-3_7

zbMATH Keywords

representationsmathematical diagramsEuclid's diagrams

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Methodology of mathematics (00A35) Foundations of classical theories (including reverse mathematics) (03B30) History of Greek and Roman mathematics (01A20) History of geometry (51-03)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Traditions of the diagram, tradition of the text: a case study
• The twofold role of diagrams in Euclid's plane geometry
• The Eu approach to formalizing Euclid: a response to ``On the inconsistency of Mumma's Eu
• Proclus’ Conception of Geometric Space and Its Actuality

This page was built for publication: Are Euclid’s Diagrams ‘Representations’? On an Argument by Ken Manders