Worm domains are not Gromov hyperbolic
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6113282
DOI10.1007/s12220-023-01320-yarXiv2208.02062MaRDI QIDQ6113282
Leandro Arosio, Matteo Fiacchi, Gian Maria Dall'Ara
Publication date: 10 July 2023
Published in: The Journal of Geometric Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.02062
Invariant metrics and pseudodistances in several complex variables (32F45) Global geometric and topological methods (à la Gromov); differential geometric analysis on metric spaces (53C23) Worm domains (32T20)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Gromov hyperbolicity and the Kobayashi metric on convex domains of finite type
- Levisches Problem und Rungescher Satz für Teilgebiete Steinscher Mannigfaltigkeiten
- Analysis and geometry on worm domains
- Peak points for pseudoconvex domains: A survey
- Behavior of the Bergman projection on the Diederich-Fornæss worm
- Pseudoconvex domains: An example with nontrivial nebenhuelle
- A construction of peak functions on weakly pseudoconvex domains
- Gromov hyperbolicity and the Kobayashi metric on strictly pseudoconvex domains
- On the Gromov hyperbolicity of convex domains in \(\mathbb{C}^n\)
- Diederich-Fornæss and Steinness indices for abstract CR manifolds
- Gromov hyperbolicity of pseudoconvex finite type domains in \(\mathbb{C}^2\)
- Tautness and complete hyperbolicity of domains in $\mathbb {C}^n$
- The core of the Levi distribution
This page was built for publication: Worm domains are not Gromov hyperbolic