The case of the Jeffreys-Lindley-paradox as a Bayes-frequentist compromise: a perspective based on the Rao-Lovric-theorem
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6123494
DOI10.1007/s13171-023-00321-xOpenAlexW4386616595MaRDI QIDQ6123494
Publication date: 4 March 2024
Published in: Sankhyā. Series A (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13171-023-00321-x
hypothesis testingLindley's paradoxBayes-non-Bayes compromiseinterval hypothesespoint-null-zero-probability paradoxstandardized p-values
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- The expected demise of the Bayes factor
- Almost sure hypothesis testing and a resolution of the Jeffreys-Lindley paradox
- Is Bayes posterior just quick and dirty confidence?
- Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis. 2nd ed
- Testing precise hypotheses. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors
- Unified frequentist and Bayesian testing of a precise hypothesis. With comments by Dennis V. Lindley, Thomas A. Louis and David Hinkley and a rejoinder by the authors
- A unified conditional frequentist and Bayesian test for fixed and sequential simple hypothesis testing
- Theory of statistics
- Mathematical statistics
- Bayesian Essentials with R
- A STATISTICAL PARADOX
- On the Foundations of Statistical Inference
- Statistical Evidence
- The Bayesian Choice
- Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”
- ValidP-Values Behave Exactly as They Should: Some Misleading Criticisms ofP-Values and Their Resolution WithS-Values
- Measure and integration theory. Transl. from the German by Robert B. Burckel
This page was built for publication: The case of the Jeffreys-Lindley-paradox as a Bayes-frequentist compromise: a perspective based on the Rao-Lovric-theorem