The \(p\)-value interpreted as the posterior probability of explaining the data: applications to multiple testing and to restricted parameter spaces
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6123498
DOI10.1007/s13171-023-00328-4OpenAlexW3037092793MaRDI QIDQ6123498
Publication date: 4 March 2024
Published in: Sankhyā. Series A (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13171-023-00328-4
multiple testingrestricted parameter spacenull hypothesis significance testingmultiple comparison proceduresreplication crisisreproducibility crisisapproximate confidence distribution
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Wonderful examples, but let's not close our eyes
- Is Bayes posterior just quick and dirty confidence?
- Credible and confidence sets for restricted parameter spaces
- Evidence and credibility: Full Bayesian signifiance test for precise hypotheses
- Self-consistent confidence sets and tests of composite hypotheses applicable to restricted parameters
- Setting confidence intervals for bounded parameters
- Asymptotic normality with small relative errors of posterior probabilities of half-spaces
- On Bayesian credible sets, restricted parameter spaces and frequentist coverage
- The sufficiency of the evidence, the relevancy of the evidence, and quantifying both with a single number
- The \(e\)-value: a fully Bayesian significance measure for precise statistical hypotheses and its research program
- Pseudo-likelihood, explanatory power, and Bayes's theorem [Comment on: ``A likelihood paradigm for clinical trials]
- Multiple testing procedures with applications to genomics.
- Modified \(p\)-values for one-sided testing in restricted parameter spaces
- Modified p-Value of Two-Sided Test for Normal Distribution with Restricted Parameter Space
- Confidence, Likelihood, Probability
- Reconciling Bayesian and Frequentist Evidence in the One-Sided Testing Problem
- Science and Statistics
- Empty confidence sets for epidemics, branching processes and Brownian motion
- On $p$-values
- Bayes Factors
- Bayes Factors Based on p-Values and Sets of Priors With Restricted Strength
- Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Defended and Calibrated by Bayesian Model Checking
- Reconnecting p-Value and Posterior Probability Under One- and Two-Sided Tests
- Confidence intervals, significance values, maximum likelihood estimates, etc. sharpened into Occam’s razors
- Confidence distributions and empirical Bayes posterior distributions unified as distributions of evidential support
- Correcting false discovery rates for their bias toward false positives
- Calibration ofρValues for Testing Precise Null Hypotheses
- Observed Confidence Levels
- Rectangular Confidence Regions for the Means of Multivariate Normal Distributions
- Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”
- ValidP-Values Behave Exactly as They Should: Some Misleading Criticisms ofP-Values and Their Resolution WithS-Values
- Three Recommendations for Improving the Use of p-Values
- Interval estimation, point estimation, and null hypothesis significance testing calibrated by an estimated posterior probability of the null hypothesis
- The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
- Statistical Inference
- Fiducialize statistical significance: transformingp-values into conservative posterior probabilities and Bayes factors
This page was built for publication: The \(p\)-value interpreted as the posterior probability of explaining the data: applications to multiple testing and to restricted parameter spaces
