Empirical underidentification in estimating random utility models: The role of choice sets and standardizations

DOI10.1111/bmsp.12256OpenAlexW3214586394MaRDI QIDQ6126886

Jörg Rieskamp, Unnamed Author, Unnamed Author

Publication date: 10 April 2024

Published in: British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12256

zbMATH Keywords

random utility modelpower utilityrisky choiceestimation techniquecorrelation of estimates

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to psychology (62P15)

Cites Work

• `Stochastically more risk averse': a contextual theory of stochastic discrete choice under risk
• Violations of the independence axiom in common ratio problems: An experimental test of some competing hypotheses
• Cumulative prospect theory's functional menagerie
• Investigation of stochastic preference theory using experimental data
• Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty
• A microeconometric test of alternative stochastic theories of risky choice
• Are preference reversals errors? An experimental investigation
• How to assess a model's testability and identifiability
• Investigating Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data
• Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk
• Does repetition improve consistency?
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Empirical underidentification in estimating random utility models: The role of choice sets and standardizations