Probabilistic causal bipolar abstract argumentation: an approach based on credal networks
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6133708
DOI10.1007/s10472-023-09851-4OpenAlexW4376644605MaRDI QIDQ6133708
Mariela Morveli-Espinoza, Juan Carlos Nieves, Cesar Augusto Tacla
Publication date: 21 August 2023
Published in: Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-023-09851-4
Knowledge representation (68T30) Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Set theory (03E99)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Probabilistic argumentation: an equational approach
- Verification in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- The theory of interval-probability as a unifying concept for uncertainty
- Probabilistic opinion pooling with imprecise probabilities
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Probabilities on extensions in abstract argumentation
- Gradual semantics for weighted bipolar SETAFs
- Thirty years of credal networks: specification, algorithms and complexity
- An imprecise probability approach for abstract argumentation based on credal sets
- Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
- Probabilistic qualification of attack in abstract argumentation
- A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments
- Graphical models for imprecise probabilities
- On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
- On the Semantics of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: A Logic Programming Approach
This page was built for publication: Probabilistic causal bipolar abstract argumentation: an approach based on credal networks