Why cross fields are not equivalent to quadrilateral meshes

DOI10.1016/j.cma.2023.116442MaRDI QIDQ6147068

Zhong-xuan Luo, Xianfeng Gu, Yiming Zhu, Na Lei, Hang Si, Xiaopeng Zheng

Publication date: 15 January 2024

Published in: Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

fiber bundlequad meshtopological obstructionAbel-Jacobihexagon meshsurface cross field generation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Numerical analysis (65-XX) Quantum theory (81-XX)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• There is no triangulation of the torus with vertex degrees \(5, 6, \dots , 6, 7\) and related results: geometric proofs for combinatorial theorems
• The Ricci flow on the 2-sphere
• Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement
• A discrete uniformization theorem for polyhedral surfaces. II
• A discrete uniformization theorem for polyhedral surfaces
• Quadrilateral mesh generation. II: Meromorphic quartic differentials and Abel-Jacobi condition
• Quadrilateral mesh generation. III: Optimizing singularity configuration based on Abel-Jacobi theory
• Discrete conformal geometry of polyhedral surfaces and its convergence
• Characteristic Classes. (AM-76)
• An Approach to Quad Meshing Based on Harmonic Cross-Valued Maps and the Ginzburg--Landau Theory
• Globally optimal direction fields
• Toroidal maps with prescribed types of vertices and faces
• On the Toroidal Analogue of Eberhard's Theorem

This page was built for publication: Why cross fields are not equivalent to quadrilateral meshes