Some remarks on recent formalist responses to the hole argument

DOI10.1007/s10701-023-00746-2OpenAlexW4389549750MaRDI QIDQ6152105

James Read, Tushar Menon

Publication date: 12 February 2024

Published in: Foundations of Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-023-00746-2

zbMATH Keywords

general relativityisometrieshole argumentmathematical structuralism

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

General relativity (83Cxx) Relativity and gravitational theory (83-XX) General and miscellaneous specific topics (00Axx)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Are Newtonian gravitation and geometrized Newtonian gravitation theoretically equivalent?
• On representational capacities, with an application to general relativity
• Regarding `Leibniz equivalence'
• Regarding the ‘Hole Argument’
• Physics, Structure, and Reality
• General Relativity
• Limits of spacetimes

This page was built for publication: Some remarks on recent formalist responses to the hole argument