Non-finite axiomatisability results via reductions: CSP parallel composition and CCS restriction
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6163879
DOI10.1007/978-3-031-15629-8_1zbMath1524.68207MaRDI QIDQ6163879
Elli Anastasiadi, Valentina Castiglioni, Anna Ingólfsdóttir, Luca Aceto
Publication date: 26 July 2023
Published in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Nested semantics over finite trees are equationally hard
- Bisimilarity is not finitely based over BPA with interrupt
- Lifting non-finite axiomatizability results to extensions of process algebras
- Algebra of communicating processes with abstraction
- Higher-level synchronising devices in Meije-SCCS
- Structured operational semantics and bisimulation as a congruence
- An algebra for process creation
- Turning SOS rules into equations
- CCS with Hennessy's merge has no finite-equational axiomatization
- On the axiomatisability of priority. III: Priority strikes again
- On the Axiomatizability of Impossible Futures
- Process algebra for synchronous communication
- Algebraic laws for nondeterminism and concurrency
- Formal verification of parallel programs
- A menagerie of non-finitely based process semantics over BPA* – from ready simulation to completed traces
- Bisimulation can't be traced
- Are Two Binary Operators Necessary to Obtain a Finite Axiomatisation of Parallel Composition?
- Probabilistic Process Algebra and Strategic Interleaving
- A finite equational base for CCS with left merge and communication merge
- Processes, Terms and Cycles: Steps on the Road to Infinity