On \(\mathcal{F} \)-systems: a graph-theoretic model for paradoxes involving a falsity predicate and its application to argumentation frameworks
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6169322
DOI10.1007/s10849-023-09394-1arXiv2005.07050OpenAlexW4321110477MaRDI QIDQ6169322
Publication date: 14 August 2023
Published in: Journal of Logic, Language and Information (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.07050
liar paradoxgroundednessYablo's paradoxargumentation frameworksconglomerates\( \mathcal{F} \)-system
Cites Work
- Dangerous reference graphs and semantic paradoxes
- On kernels and semikernels of digraphs
- Notes on the mathematical aspects of Kripke's theory of truth
- Conjunction and disjunction in infectious logics
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Reference, paradoxes and truth
- The Yablo Paradox
- Embracing intensionality: Paradoxicality and semi-truth operators in fixed point models
- On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
- Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
- Yablo's paradox
- Paradox without Self-Reference
- Outline of a Theory of Truth
- Defining LFIs and LFUs in extensions of infectious logics
- A GRAPH-THEORETIC ANALYSIS OF THE SEMANTIC PARADOXES
- Patterns of paradox
This page was built for publication: On \(\mathcal{F} \)-systems: a graph-theoretic model for paradoxes involving a falsity predicate and its application to argumentation frameworks