Intuitions, theory choice and the ameliorative character of logical theories
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6180123
DOI10.1007/S11229-021-03329-8zbMath1528.03025OpenAlexW3187373442MaRDI QIDQ6180123
Publication date: 19 January 2024
Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03329-8
abductivism in logicameliorative analysisCarnapian explicationlogical intuitionspredictivism in logic
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Logical predictivism
- Frege and Carnap on the normativity of logic
- Carnapian explication, formalisms as cognitive tools, and the paradox of adequate formalization
- Full-blooded anti-exceptionalism about logic
- Logical Pluralism
- Squeezing arguments
- On the Concept of Following Logically
- The Dialogical Roots of Deduction
- What Counts as Evidence for a Logical Theory?
- Modal Logic as Metaphysics
This page was built for publication: Intuitions, theory choice and the ameliorative character of logical theories