Which method delivers greater signal‐to‐noise ratio: Structural equation modelling or regression analysis with weighted composites?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6185857
DOI10.1111/bmsp.12293zbMath1529.62088OpenAlexW4311111285MaRDI QIDQ6185857
Publication date: 30 January 2024
Published in: British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12293
Factor analysis and principal components; correspondence analysis (62H25) Linear regression; mixed models (62J05) Applications of statistics to psychology (62P15)
Related Items (2)
Premature conclusions about the signal‐to‐noise ratio in structural equation modeling research: A commentary on Yuan and Fang (2023) ⋮ Replies to comments on "Which method delivers greater signal‐to‐noise ratio: Structural equation modelling or regression analysis with weighted composites?" by Yuan and Fang (2023)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- A unified approach to exploratory factor analysis with missing data, nonnormal data, and in the presence of outliers
- Biases and standard errors of standardized regression coefficients
- Some comments on maximum likelihood and partial least squares methods
- The asymptotic normal distribution of estimators in factor analysis under general conditions
- The asymptotic effect of substituting estimators for parameters in certain types of statistics
- Consistent and asymptotically normal PLS estimators for linear structural equations
- The partial least squares-fix point method of estimating interdependent systems with latent variables
- Partial Least Squares Path Modeling
- 10 Structural Equation Modeling
This page was built for publication: Which method delivers greater signal‐to‐noise ratio: Structural equation modelling or regression analysis with weighted composites?
