Analyzing anchoring bias in attribute weight elicitation of SMART, Swing, and best‐worst method

DOI10.1111/itor.13171OpenAlexW4285593710MaRDI QIDQ6187245

Jafar Rezaei, Mohammadreza Mehregan, Unnamed Author

Publication date: 31 January 2024

Published in: International Transactions in Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13171

zbMATH Keywords

SMARTcognitive biasMADManchoring biasbest-worst methodSwingmulti-attribute weighting

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Operations research, mathematical programming (90-XX)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Capturing decision maker preference: Experimental comparison of decision analysis and MCDM techniques
• The effects of anchoring an interactive MCDM solution methods
• Are groups `less behavioral'? The case of anchoring
• On preference elicitation processes which mitigate the accumulation of biases in multi-criteria decision analysis
• Survey of methods to visualize alternatives in multiple criteria decision making problems
• Comparative Evaluation of Some Interactive Approaches to Multicriterion Optimization
• The Effect of Attribute Ranges on Weights in Multiattribute Utility Measurements
• There Is Hope In Attribute Weighting
• On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods.
• Behavioral and procedural consequences of structural variation in value trees
• Multi-criteria decision making methods. A comparative study
• Pairwise comparisons or constrained optimization? A usability evaluation of techniques for eliciting decision priorities
• An output‐oriented classification of multiple attribute decision‐making techniques based on fuzzy c‐means clustering method

This page was built for publication: Analyzing anchoring bias in attribute weight elicitation of SMART, Swing, and best‐worst method