Mean-based Borda count for paradox-free comparisons of optimization algorithms

DOI10.1016/j.ins.2024.120120OpenAlexW4390779339MaRDI QIDQ6198764

Yunpeng Jing, Qunfeng Liu, Yuan Yan, Yun Li

Publication date: 20 March 2024

Published in: Information Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2024.120120

zbMATH Keywords

hypothesis testingoptimization algorithmsnumerical comparisonBorda countcycle ranking

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Nonparametric hypothesis testing (62G10) Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03) Numerical computation of eigenvalues and eigenvectors of matrices (65F15) Numerical optimization and variational techniques (65K10)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Analytical and numerical comparisons of biogeography-based optimization and genetic algorithms
• Independence of clones as a criterion for voting rules
• A study on the use of non-parametric tests for analyzing the evolutionary algorithms' behaviour: a case study on the CEC'2005 special session on real parameter optimization
• Condorcet's paradox
• Numerical comparison of some penalty-based constraint handling techniques in genetic algorithms
• Operational zones for comparing metaheuristic and deterministic one-dimensional global optimization algorithms
• The original Borda count and partial voting
• A Consistent Extension of Condorcet’s Election Principle
• Benchmarking Derivative-Free Optimization Algorithms
• Benchmarking optimization software with performance profiles.