AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks

DOI10.1016/j.ijar.2010.05.004zbMath1211.68433arXiv1810.04886OpenAlexW2032626375WikidataQ57499569 ScholiaQ57499569MaRDI QIDQ622279

Federico Cerutti, Giovanni Guida, Massimiliano Giacomin, Pietro Baroni

Publication date: 31 January 2011

Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04886

zbMATH Keywords

argumentation semanticsargumentation frameworksargument attack relation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)

Related Items (23)

Gödel semantics of fuzzy argumentation frameworks with consistency degrees ⋮ Arguing about informant credibility in open multi-agent systems ⋮ RAFDivider  : a distributed algorithm for computing semantics in higher-order abstract argumentation frameworks ⋮ A logic of argumentation for specification and verification of abstract argumentation frameworks ⋮ A general approach to extension-based semantics in abstract argumentation ⋮ An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support ⋮ Theoretical analysis and implementation of abstract argumentation frameworks with domain assignments ⋮ Generating possible intentions with constrained argumentation systems ⋮ Handling support cycles and collective interactions in the logical encoding of higher-order bipolar argumentation frameworks ⋮ A multi attack argumentation framework ⋮ A socio-cognitive model of trust using argumentation theory ⋮ Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations ⋮ On the input/output behavior of argumentation frameworks ⋮ Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches ⋮ On the Semantics of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: A Logic Programming Approach ⋮ Algorithms for decision problems in argument systems under preferred semantics ⋮ On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance ⋮ A labelling framework for probabilistic argumentation ⋮ Valid attacks in argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks ⋮ Probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks, a possible world view ⋮ AFRA ⋮ Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a survey ⋮ Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding

Uses Software

• ASPARTIX

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics
• An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases
• Audiences in argumentation frameworks
• On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
• A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Semantics for higher level attacks in extended argumentation frames. I: Overview
• Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques
• Fibring argumentation frames
• Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values
• An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
• On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
• On the Meta-logic of Arguments
• Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning
• Coalitions of arguments: A tool for handling bipolar argumentation frameworks

This page was built for publication: AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks