Deprecated: $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=false is deprecated, set $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=true, $wgMWOAuthSharedUserSource='local' instead [Called from MediaWiki\HookContainer\HookContainer::run in /var/www/html/w/includes/HookContainer/HookContainer.php at line 135] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372
Forcing a $\square(\kappa)$-like principle to hold at a weakly compact cardinal - MaRDI portal

Forcing a $\square(\kappa)$-like principle to hold at a weakly compact cardinal

From MaRDI portal
Publication:6313936

DOI10.1016/J.APAL.2021.102960arXiv1902.04146MaRDI QIDQ6313936

Brent Cody, Chris Lambie-Hanson, Victoria Gitman

Publication date: 11 February 2019

Abstract: Hellsten cite{MR2026390} proved that when kappa is Pin1-indescribable, the emph{n-club} subsets of kappa provide a filter base for the Pin1-indescribability ideal, and hence can also be used to give a characterization of Pin1-indescribable sets which resembles the definition of stationarity: a set Ssubseteqkappa is Pin1-indescribable if and only if ScapCeqemptyset for every n-club Csubseteqkappa. By replacing clubs with n-clubs in the definition of Box(kappa), one obtains a Box(kappa)-like principle Boxn(kappa), a version of which was first considered by Brickhill and Welch cite{BrickhillWelch}. The principle Boxn(kappa) is consistent with the Pin1-indescribability of kappa but inconsistent with the Pin+11-indescribability of kappa. By generalizing the standard forcing to add a Box(kappa)-sequence, we show that if kappa is kappa+-weakly compact and mathrmGCH holds then there is a cofinality-preserving forcing extension in which kappa remains kappa+-weakly compact and Box1(kappa) holds. If kappa is Pi21-indescribable and mathrmGCH holds then there is a cofinality-preserving forcing extension in which kappa is kappa+-weakly compact, Box1(kappa) holds and every weakly compact subset of kappa has a weakly compact proper initial segment. As an application, we prove that, relative to a Pi21-indescribable cardinal, it is consistent that kappa is kappa+-weakly compact, every weakly compact subset of kappa has a weakly compact proper initial segment, and there exist two weakly compact subsets S0 and S1 of kappa such that there is no for which both and are weakly compact.












This page was built for publication: Forcing a $\square(\kappa)$-like principle to hold at a weakly compact cardinal

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6313936)