Forcing a $\square(\kappa)$-like principle to hold at a weakly compact cardinal
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6313936
DOI10.1016/J.APAL.2021.102960arXiv1902.04146MaRDI QIDQ6313936
Brent Cody, Chris Lambie-Hanson, Victoria Gitman
Publication date: 11 February 2019
Abstract: Hellsten cite{MR2026390} proved that when is -indescribable, the emph{-club} subsets of provide a filter base for the -indescribability ideal, and hence can also be used to give a characterization of -indescribable sets which resembles the definition of stationarity: a set is -indescribable if and only if for every -club . By replacing clubs with -clubs in the definition of , one obtains a -like principle , a version of which was first considered by Brickhill and Welch cite{BrickhillWelch}. The principle is consistent with the -indescribability of but inconsistent with the -indescribability of . By generalizing the standard forcing to add a -sequence, we show that if is -weakly compact and holds then there is a cofinality-preserving forcing extension in which remains -weakly compact and holds. If is -indescribable and holds then there is a cofinality-preserving forcing extension in which is -weakly compact, holds and every weakly compact subset of has a weakly compact proper initial segment. As an application, we prove that, relative to a -indescribable cardinal, it is consistent that is -weakly compact, every weakly compact subset of has a weakly compact proper initial segment, and there exist two weakly compact subsets and of such that there is no for which both and are weakly compact.
Consistency and independence results (03E35) Large cardinals (03E55) Other combinatorial set theory (03E05) Other aspects of forcing and Boolean-valued models (03E40) Ordered sets and their cofinalities; pcf theory (03E04)
This page was built for publication: Forcing a $\square(\kappa)$-like principle to hold at a weakly compact cardinal
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6313936)