Deprecated: $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=false is deprecated, set $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=true, $wgMWOAuthSharedUserSource='local' instead [Called from MediaWiki\HookContainer\HookContainer::run in /var/www/html/w/includes/HookContainer/HookContainer.php at line 135] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372
Resolving the two envelope paradox - MaRDI portal

Deprecated: Use of MediaWiki\Skin\SkinTemplate::injectLegacyMenusIntoPersonalTools was deprecated in Please make sure Skin option menus contains `user-menu` (and possibly `notifications`, `user-interface-preferences`, `user-page`) 1.46. [Called from MediaWiki\Skin\SkinTemplate::getPortletsTemplateData in /var/www/html/w/includes/Skin/SkinTemplate.php at line 691] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372

Deprecated: Use of MediaWiki\Skin\BaseTemplate::getPersonalTools was deprecated in 1.46 Call $this->getSkin()->getPersonalToolsForMakeListItem instead (T422975). [Called from Skins\Chameleon\Components\NavbarHorizontal\PersonalTools::getHtml in /var/www/html/w/skins/chameleon/src/Components/NavbarHorizontal/PersonalTools.php at line 66] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372

Deprecated: Use of QuickTemplate::(get/html/text/haveData) with parameter `personal_urls` was deprecated in MediaWiki Use content_navigation instead. [Called from MediaWiki\Skin\QuickTemplate::get in /var/www/html/w/includes/Skin/QuickTemplate.php at line 131] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372

Resolving the two envelope paradox

From MaRDI portal
Publication:6357945

arXiv2101.03484MaRDI QIDQ6357945

Author name not available (Why is that?)

Publication date: 10 January 2021

Abstract: Consider the following game: You are given two indistinguishable envelopes, each containing money. One contains twice as much as the other. You may pick one envelope and keep the money it contains. Having chosen an envelope, you are given the chance to switch envelopes. Should you switch? The intuitive answer is that it makes no difference, since you are equally likely to have picked the envelope with the higher or the lower amount. However, a naive expected value calculation implies you gain by switching, since you have 50% chance of doubling and 50% chance of halving your current winnings, and so if the first chosen envelope contains X, then switching gives an expected final value of (X/2+2X)/2>X. That seems like a paradox. We prove that the former is the correct answer, and show how the apparent "paradox" can be resolved.




Has companion code repository: https://github.com/nemozen/math/blob/master/envelope_paradox.ipynb








This page was built for publication: Resolving the two envelope paradox

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6357945)