Event-separability in the Ellsberg urn
From MaRDI portal
Publication:641821
DOI10.1007/s00199-011-0652-4zbMath1276.91043OpenAlexW1968017792MaRDI QIDQ641821
Publication date: 25 October 2011
Published in: Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-011-0652-4
Related Items
The statistical properties of the threshold model and the feedback leadership condition, On stochastic independence under ambiguity, Purely subjective variational preferences, A full characterization of Nash implementation with strategy space reduction, Cobb-Douglas preferences under uncertainty, Source and rank-dependent utility, Expected utility theory, Jeffrey's decision theory, and the paradoxes, Attitudes toward uncertainty and randomization: an experimental study, Dynamic consistency for non-expected utility preferences, Risk, ambiguity, and state-preference theory, Decision making in phantom spaces, Belief hedges: Measuring ambiguity for all events and all models
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Increasing risk with state-dependent preferences
- A theory of subjective compound lotteries
- `Expected utility \(/\) subjective probability' analysis without the sure-thing principle or probabilistic sophistication
- Small worlds: Modeling attitudes toward sources of uncertainty
- Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms
- Uncertainty Aversion with Second-Order Utilities and Probabilities
- Ambiguity and Second-Order Belief
- The Ellsberg Paradox and Risk Aversion: An Anticipated Utility Approach
- Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity
- A More Robust Definition of Subjective Probability
- A Smooth Model of Decision Making under Ambiguity
- Ellsberg Revisited: An Experimental Study
- The Foundations of Decision Under Uncertainty: An Elementary Exposition
- A Definition of Subjective Probability
- Probability, Utility, and the Independence Axiom
- Le Comportement de l'Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l'Ecole Americaine
