Bringing the hole argument back in the loop: a response to Pooley

DOI10.1016/j.shpsb.2006.01.003zbMath1223.83024OpenAlexW2084972962MaRDI QIDQ643054

Dean Rickles

Publication date: 27 October 2011

Published in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part B. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2006.01.003

zbMATH Keywords

general covariancehole argumentspin networksdiffeomorphism invarianceloop quantum gravityconstrained Hamiltonian systems

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Gravitational interaction in quantum theory (81V17) Quantization of the gravitational field (83C45)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• A new spin on the hole argument
• A hole revolution, or are we back where we started?

This page was built for publication: Bringing the hole argument back in the loop: a response to Pooley