Why were matrix mechanics and wave mechanics considered equivalent?

DOI10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.01.004zbMath1223.81010OpenAlexW2051261237MaRDI QIDQ643466

Slobodan Perovic

Publication date: 31 October 2011

Published in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part B. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.01.004

zbMATH Keywords

equivalencequantum mechanicsisomorphismmatrix mechanicswave mechanicsNiels Bohr's atom

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

History of mathematics in the 20th century (01A60) History of quantum theory (81-03) General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05)

Related Items (2)

To envision a new particle or change an existing law? Hypothesis formation and anomaly resolution for the curious case of the \({\beta}\) decay spectrum ⋮ From canonical transformations to transformation theory, 1926--1927: the road to Jordan's ``Neue Begründung

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• The equivalence myth of quantum mechanics. II
• The equivalence myth of quantum mechanics. I
• Schrödinger's interpretation of quantum mechanics and the relevance of Bohr's experimental critique
• A comparison of the meaning and uses of models in mathematics and the empirical sciences

This page was built for publication: Why were matrix mechanics and wave mechanics considered equivalent?