Why quantum mechanics favors adynamical and acausal interpretations such as relational blockworld over backwardly causal and time-symmetric rivals

DOI10.1016/J.SHPSB.2008.07.005zbMath1223.81046OpenAlexW2141072210MaRDI QIDQ643484

Michael Silberstein, William Mark Stuckey, Michael Cifone

Publication date: 31 October 2011

Published in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part B. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.07.005

zbMATH Keywords

localitytime-symmetric quantum mechanicsrelational blockworldhidden variablebackwards causationblockworld

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05)

Related Items (3)

Absorbers in the transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics ⋮ Being, becoming and the undivided universe: a dialogue between relational blockworld and the implicate order concerning the unification of relativity and quantum theory ⋮ The quantum liar experiment in Cramer's transactional interpretation

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Time-symmetrised quantum theory, counterfactuals and `advanced action'
• Time-symmetric quantum mechanics
• Reconciling spacetime and the quantum: Relational blockworld and the quantum liar paradox
• Revisiting Hardy's paradox: Counterfactual statements, real measurements, entanglement and weak values
• Towards a local hidden variable theory
• Quantum Chance and Non-locality
• Nonlocality for two particles without inequalities for almost all entangled states
• Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?

This page was built for publication: Why quantum mechanics favors adynamical and acausal interpretations such as relational blockworld over backwardly causal and time-symmetric rivals