Categorical Proof-Theoretic Semantics
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6508875
arXiv2302.09031MaRDI QIDQ6508875
Author name not available (Why is that?)
Abstract: In proof-theoretic semantics, model-theoretic validity is replaced by proof-theoretic validity. Validity of formulae is defined inductively from a base giving the validity of atoms using inductive clauses derived from proof-theoretic rules. A key aim is to show completeness of the proof rules without any requirement for formal models. Establishing this for propositional intuitionistic logic (IPL) raises some technical and conceptual issues. We relate Sandqvist's (complete) base-extension semantics of intuitionistic propositional logic to categorical proof theory in presheaves, reconstructing categorically the soundness and completeness arguments, thereby demonstrating the naturality of Sandqvist's constructions. This naturality includes Sandqvist's treatment of disjunction that is based on its second-order or elimination-rule presentation. These constructions embody not just validity, but certain forms of objects of justifications. This analysis is taken a step further by showing that from the perspective of validity, Sandqvist's semantics can also be viewed as the natural disjunction in a category of sheaves.
This page was built for publication: Categorical Proof-Theoretic Semantics
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6508875)