Reasoning in assumption-based argumentation using tree-decompositions
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6545531
DOI10.1007/978-3-031-43619-2_14MaRDI QIDQ6545531
Johannes Peter Wallner, Andrei Popescu
Publication date: 29 May 2024
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Argument graphs and assumption-based argumentation
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- Computational properties of argument systems satisfying graph-theoretic constraints
- An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
- QBF as an alternative to Courcelle's theorem
- The first international competition on computational models of argumentation: results and analysis
- Towards fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for abstract argumentation
- On the computational complexity of assumption-based argumentation for default reasoning.
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Logic programs with stable model semantics as a constraint programming paradigm
- Computational complexity of flat and generic assumption-based argumentation, with and without probabilities
- Bounded treewidth as a key to tractability of knowledge representation and reasoning
- Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a survey
- Answer set solving with bounded treewidth revisited
- A practical account into counting Dung's extensions by dynamic programming
- The D-FLAT System for Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions
- D-FLAT^2: Subset Minimization in Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions Made Easy
- Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
- Declarative Algorithms and Complexity Results for Assumption-Based Argumentation
- Lower Bounds for QBFs of Bounded Treewidth
- Multi-shot ASP solving with clingo
- Exploiting Database Management Systems and Treewidth for Counting
This page was built for publication: Reasoning in assumption-based argumentation using tree-decompositions