WhatsUpp with sender keys? Analysis, improvements and security proofs
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6604932
DOI10.1007/978-981-99-8733-7_10zbMath1547.94314MaRDI QIDQ6604932
David Balbás, Phillip Gajland, Daniel Collins
Publication date: 13 September 2024
Related Items (3)
WhatsUpp with sender keys? Analysis, improvements and security proofs ⋮ Symmetric signcryption and E2EE group messaging in Keybase ⋮ Ring signatures for deniable AKEM: Gandalf's fellowship
Cites Work
- Towards bidirectional ratcheted key exchange
- Optimal channel security against fine-grained state compromise: the safety of messaging
- Ratcheted encryption and key exchange: the security of messaging
- Security analysis and improvements for the IETF MLS standard for group messaging
- On the price of concurrency in group ratcheting protocols
- Continuous group key agreement with active security
- CoCoA: concurrent continuous group key agreement
- A formal security analysis of the Signal messaging protocol
- The double ratchet: security notions, proofs, and modularization for the Signal protocol
- Determining the core primitive for optimally secure ratcheting
- A more complete analysis of the signal double ratchet algorithm
- On the insider security of MLS
- On the worst-case inefficiency of CGKA
- On secure ratcheting with immediate decryption
- Bidirectional Asynchronous Ratcheted Key Agreement with Linear Complexity
- WhatsUpp with sender keys? Analysis, improvements and security proofs
This page was built for publication: WhatsUpp with sender keys? Analysis, improvements and security proofs
