Against the ``one method fits all data sets philosophy for comparison studies in methodological research
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6625353
DOI10.1002/bimj.202200104zbMATH Open1547.62465MaRDI QIDQ6625353
Friedrich Leisch, Carolin Strobl
Publication date: 28 October 2024
Published in: Biometrical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Statistical modeling: The two cultures. (With comments and a rejoinder).
- (Psycho-)analysis of benchmark experiments: a formal framework for investigating the relationship between data sets and learning algorithms
- Measuring the Stability of Results From Supervised Statistical Learning
- Benchmark and Survey of Automated Machine Learning Frameworks
Related Items (4)
From RNA sequencing measurements to the final results: a practical guide to navigating the choices and uncertainties of gene set analysis ⋮ Pitfalls and potentials in simulation studies: questionable research practices in comparative simulation studies allow for spurious claims of superiority of any method ⋮ Explaining the optimistic performance evaluation of newly proposed methods: a cross-design validation experiment ⋮ Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies with multiple thresholds: comparison of approaches in a simulation study
This page was built for publication: Against the ``one method fits all data sets philosophy for comparison studies in methodological research