A comparison of strategies for selecting auxiliary variables for multiple imputation

DOI10.1002/bimj.202200291zbMath1547.62355MaRDI QIDQ6625385

Ian R. White, Margarita Moreno-Betancur, Rheanna M. Mainzer, Katherine J. Lee, John B. Carlin, Cattram D. Nguyen

Publication date: 28 October 2024

Published in: Biometrical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

missing datavariable selectionimputation model

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Missing data. Analysis and design
• Avoiding bias due to perfect prediction in multiple imputation of incomplete categorical variables
• Multiple Imputation After 18+ Years
• Inference and missing data
• Flexible Imputation of Missing Data, Second Edition
• An Introduction to Statistical Learning
• Using the Fraction of Missing Information to Identify Auxiliary Variables for Imputation Procedures via Proxy Pattern‐mixture Models
• Multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in longitudinal studies with sampling weights: Comparison of methods implemented in Stata
• The coverage properties of confidence regions after model selection
• Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods
• A comparison of multiple imputation strategies for handling missing data in multi-item scales: guidance for longitudinal studies

This page was built for publication: A comparison of strategies for selecting auxiliary variables for multiple imputation