Estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses and adaptive false discovery rate control in discrete paradigm
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6625430
DOI10.1002/bimj.202200204zbMATH Open1547.62146MaRDI QIDQ6625430
Aniket Biswas, Gaurangadeb Chattopadhyay
Publication date: 28 October 2024
Published in: Biometrical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Adaptive FDR control under independence and dependence
- Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate
- Multiple testing with discrete data: Proportion of true null hypotheses and two adaptive FDR procedures
- Strong Control, Conservative Point Estimation and Simultaneous Conservative Consistency of False Discovery Rates: A Unified Approach
- A Direct Approach to False Discovery Rates
- Regarding Paper “Multiple testing with discrete data: Proportion of true null hypotheses and two adaptive FDR procedures” by Xiongzhi Chen, Rebecca W. Doerge, and Joseph F. Heyse
- Comments on Dr. Aniket Biswas' Letter to the Editor
- Bias-corrected estimators for proportion of true null hypotheses: application of adaptive FDR-controlling in segmented failure data
- False discovery rate control for multiple testing based on discrete p‐values
- Estimating the Proportion of True Null Hypotheses, with application to DNA Microarray Data
- A Modified False Discovery Rate Multiple-Comparisons Procedure for Discrete Data, Applied to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Genetics
This page was built for publication: Estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses and adaptive false discovery rate control in discrete paradigm
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6625430)