A comparison of estimation methods adjusting for selection bias in adaptive enrichment designs with time-to-event endpoints
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6628068
DOI10.1002/sim.9327zbMath1547.62208MaRDI QIDQ6628068
Fulvio Di Stefano, Veronique Robert, Stephanie Galtier, Matthieu Pannaux, Anne Correges, Gaelle Saint-Hilary
Publication date: 29 October 2024
Published in: Statistics in Medicine (Search for Journal in Brave)
survival datapoint estimationselection biasadaptive designinterim analysisenrichment designssubpopulation selection
Related Items (2)
Point estimation for adaptive trial designs. I: A methodological review ⋮ Adjusting for treatment selection in phase II/III clinical trials with time to event data
Cites Work
- Two stage conditionally unbiased estimators of the selected mean
- Point estimates and confidence regions for sequential trials involving selection
- Multiple Comparisons Among Means
- Adjusting for selection bias in assessing treatment effect estimates from multiple subgroups
- On the bias of maximum likelihood estimation following a sequential test
- Unbiased Estimation of Selected Treatment Means in Two‐Stage Trials
- Rectangular Confidence Regions for the Means of Multivariate Normal Distributions
This page was built for publication: A comparison of estimation methods adjusting for selection bias in adaptive enrichment designs with time-to-event endpoints