Dealing with confounding in observational studies: a scoping review of methods evaluated in simulation studies with single-point exposure
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6629943
DOI10.1002/SIM.9628zbMATH Open1548.62465MaRDI QIDQ6629943
Anita Natalia Varga, Joran Lokkerbol, Judith Ekkina Bosmans, Maurits Willem van Tulder, Alejandra Elizabeth Guevara Morel, Johanna Maria van Dongen
Publication date: 30 October 2024
Published in: Statistics in Medicine (Search for Journal in Brave)
Cites Work
- The prognostic analogue of the propensity score
- A two-step Bayesian approach for propensity score analysis: simulations and case study
- Demystifying double robustness: a comparison of alternative strategies for estimating a population mean from incomplete data
- Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward
- On negative outcome control of unobserved confounding as a generalization of difference-in-differences
- Estimating effects with rare outcomes and high dimensional covariates: knowledge is power
- Comparison of Approaches to Weight Truncation for Marginal Structural Cox Models
- Methods in Comparative Effectiveness Research
- An alternative robust estimator of average treatment effect in causal inference
- Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects
- How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?
- Optimal Bandwidth Choice for the Regression Discontinuity Estimator
- Balancing Covariates via Propensity Score Weighting
- Model Feedback in Bayesian Propensity Score Estimation
- Bounded, Efficient and Multiply Robust Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using Instrumental Variables
- Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect
- Propensity score modeling strategies for the causal analysis of observational data
- Covariate Balancing Propensity Score
- Causal Inference With General Treatment Regimes
- The use of prognostic scores for causal inference with general treatment regimes
- Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods
- Propensity score weighting for covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials
- Propensity score weighting for causal subgroup analysis
- Selection bias when using instrumental variable methods to compare two treatments but more than two treatments are available
- A weighting analogue to pair matching in propensity score analysis
- Comparing approaches to causal inference for longitudinal data: inverse probability weighting versus propensity scores
- The relative performance of targeted maximum likelihood estimators
- Evaluating treatment effectiveness in patient subgroups: a comparison of propensity score methods with an automated matching approach
Related Items (1)
This page was built for publication: Dealing with confounding in observational studies: a scoping review of methods evaluated in simulation studies with single-point exposure
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6629943)
