Should we embrace impossible worlds due to the flaws of normal modal logic?

DOI10.1007/S11787-024-00344-4MaRDI QIDQ6633053

Til Eyinck

Publication date: 5 November 2024

Published in: Logica Universalis (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

logical omnisciencenormal modal logicdisagreement in metaphysicsimpossible world semantics

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Modal logic (including the logic of norms) (03B45) Other nonclassical logic (03B60) Logic of natural languages (03B65) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42) Knowledge representation (68T30)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Logical omniscience as infeasibility
• Impossible possible worlds vindicated
• Williamson on counterpossibles
• Impossible worlds and the logic of imagination
• Logically Impossible Worlds
• Reasoning about rational, but not logically omniscient, agents
• Bemerkungen Zur Semantik Nicht‐Normaler Möglicher Welten

This page was built for publication: Should we embrace impossible worlds due to the flaws of normal modal logic?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6633053)