Comparing four methods for estimating tree-based treatment regimes
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6636144
DOI10.1515/IJB-2016-0068MaRDI QIDQ6636144
Publication date: 12 November 2024
Published in: The International Journal of Biostatistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Doubly Robust Estimation in Missing Data and Causal Inference Models
- Estimating treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized program evaluation
- Program evaluation as a decision problem
- Performance guarantees for individualized treatment rules
- A comparison of five recursive partitioning methods to find person subgroups involved in meaningful treatment-subgroup interactions
- Regularized outcome weighted subgroup identification for differential treatment effects
- Using decision lists to construct interpretable and parsimonious treatment regimes
- Estimating the Error Rate of a Prediction Rule: Improvement on Cross-Validation
- Tree-based methods for individualized treatment regimes
- Generalized M‐fluctuation tests for parameter instability
- A Generalized Estimator of the Attributable Benefit of an Optimal Treatment Regime
- Estimating Individualized Treatment Rules Using Outcome Weighted Learning
- Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes
- A Robust Method for Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes
- Survival Trees by Goodness of Split
- Robust estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes for sequential treatment decisions
- Demystifying Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes
- The Elements of Statistical Learning
- Estimating optimal treatment regimes from a classification perspective
- Model-based recursive partitioning for subgroup analyses
- Interaction trees with censored survival data
Related Items (1)
This page was built for publication: Comparing four methods for estimating tree-based treatment regimes
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6636144)
