Time and Indexicality in Buridan’s Concept of Logical Consequence
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6650470
DOI10.1080/01445340.2021.1915022MaRDI QIDQ6650470
Publication date: 9 December 2024
Published in: History and Philosophy of Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Modal logic (including the logic of norms) (03B45) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) History of mathematics in Late Antiquity and medieval Europe (01A35) History of mathematical logic and foundations (03-03)
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The medieval theory of consequence
- ``Inference versus consequence revisited: inference, consequence, conditional, implication
- Arthur Prior and medieval logic
- Prior on an insolubilium of Jean Buridan
- Natural deduction, hybrid systems and modal logics
- Mediaeval and Renaissance logic
- Truth and consequence in mediaeval logic
- Hybrid logics: Characterization, interpolation and complexity
- Consequences of a closed, token-based semantics: the case of John Buridan
- A theory of truth based on a medieval solution to the liar paradox
- Logical Pluralism
- John Buridan’s Theory of Consequence and His Octagons of Opposition
- Articulating Medieval Logic
- To the memory of Arthur Prior Formal properties of ‘now’
- Buridan'sConsequentia: Consequence and Inference Within a Token-Based Semantics
- Omnis propositio est affirmativa; ergo, nulla propositio est negativa (and the paradox of validity)
This page was built for publication: Time and Indexicality in Buridan’s Concept of Logical Consequence
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6650470)
