Suslin's hypothesis does not imply stationary antichains

DOI10.1016/0168-0072(93)90032-9zbMath0805.03037OpenAlexW2076880321MaRDI QIDQ688435

Chaz Schlindwein

Publication date: 5 February 1995

Published in: Annals of Pure and Applied Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-0072(93)90032-9

zbMATH Keywords

Aronszajn treecountable support forcing iterationSuslin's hypothesis

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Other combinatorial set theory (03E05) Other aspects of forcing and Boolean-valued models (03E40)

Related Items (4)

A forcing axiom for a non-special Aronszajn tree ⋮ SH plus CH does not imply stationary antichains. ⋮ Understanding preservation theorems: Chapter VI of \textit{Proper and improper forcing}. I ⋮ Antidiamond principles and topological applications

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Set theory. An introduction to independence proofs
• Proper forcing
• Adding a closed unbounded set
• Consistency of Suslin's hypothesis, a nonspecial Aronszajn tree, and GCH
• Embedding Trees in the Rationals
• Multiple Forcing

This page was built for publication: Suslin's hypothesis does not imply stationary antichains