Fairness, spite, and intentions: testing different motives behind punishment in a prisoners' dilemma game

DOI10.1016/J.ECONLET.2012.04.048zbMath1253.91042OpenAlexW1963799615MaRDI QIDQ694919

Charlotte Klempt

Publication date: 19 December 2012

Published in: Economics Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.048

zbMATH Keywords

fairnesscooperationintentionssanctioningspitefulness

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Multistage and repeated games (91A20) Experimental studies (91A90)

Related Items (1)

Perceived motives and reciprocity

Uses Software

• Z-Tree

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Do non-strategic sanctions obey the law of demand? The demand for punishment in the voluntary contribution mechanism
• A theory of sequential reciprocity
• An experimental study of truth-telling in a sender-receiver game
• Testing theories of fairness-intentions matter
• Driving Forces Behind Informal Sanctions

This page was built for publication: Fairness, spite, and intentions: testing different motives behind punishment in a prisoners' dilemma game