The appropriate total ranking method using DEA for multiple categorized purposes
From MaRDI portal
Publication:697559
DOI10.1016/S0377-0427(02)00425-9zbMath1066.91024OpenAlexW2092610412MaRDI QIDQ697559
Hiroshi Noguchi, Hiroaki Ishii, Masaru Ogawa
Publication date: 17 September 2002
Published in: Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-0427(02)00425-9
Related Items (25)
An improved cross-ranking method in data envelopment analysis ⋮ Multistage decision making based on prioritization of hesitant multiplicative preference relations ⋮ An integrated approach for resource allocation in manufacturing plants ⋮ Discriminating DEA efficient candidates by considering their least relative total scores ⋮ Aggregating preference rankings using OWA operator weights ⋮ Trajectories of efficiency measurement: a bibliometric analysis of DEA and SFA ⋮ Identifying conflict patterns to reach a consensus -- a novel group decision approach ⋮ An improved method for ranking alternatives in multiple criteria decision analysis ⋮ Ranking of petrochemical companies using preferential voting at unequal levels of voting power through data envelopment analysis ⋮ Methods of critical value reduction for type-2 fuzzy variables and their applications ⋮ The overall efficiency of the dynamic DEA models ⋮ Improved Kemeny Median Indicator Ranks Accordance Method ⋮ Volume‐based ranking method for a ranked voting system ⋮ A new approach for ranking of candidates in voting systems ⋮ Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution ⋮ Fair ranking of the decision making units using optimistic and pessimistic weights in data envelopment analysis ⋮ An integrated data envelopment analysis and simulation method for group consensus ranking ⋮ A novel approach for discriminating efficient candidates by classifying voters in the preferential voting framework ⋮ A solution method to the problem proposed by Wang in voting systems ⋮ Ranking all units in data envelopment analysis ⋮ Two effective total ranking models for preference voting and aggregation ⋮ Preference aggregation and DEA: an analysis of the methods proposed to discriminate efficient candidates ⋮ Strategic development for the Department of Information Management of Shih Chien University Kaohsiung campus in Taiwan by a quantifiable SWOT analysis ⋮ New approaches for determining a common set of weights for a voting system ⋮ Aggregating preferences rankings with variable weights
Cites Work
This page was built for publication: The appropriate total ranking method using DEA for multiple categorized purposes
