Mathematical Research Data Initiative
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Create a new Item
Create a new Property
Create a new EntitySchema
Merge two items
In other projects
Discussion
View source
View history
Purge
English
Log in

Condorcet vs. Borda in light of a dual majoritarian approach

From MaRDI portal
Publication:719049
Jump to:navigation, search

DOI10.1007/s11238-009-9157-zzbMath1232.91166OpenAlexW2167485117MaRDI QIDQ719049

Eyal Baharad, Shmuel Nitzan

Publication date: 27 September 2011

Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/96031


zbMATH Keywords

Condorcet criterionerosion of majority principlemajority decisivenessthe Borda method of counts


Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Voting theory (91B12) Social choice (91B14)




Cites Work

  • Unnamed Item
  • Unnamed Item
  • Unnamed Item
  • Unnamed Item
  • The Borda dictionary
  • The costs of implementing the majority principle: The golden voting rule
  • Condorcet's paradox
  • The probability of the paradox of voting: A computable solution
  • The Condorcet efficiency of approval voting and the probability of electing the Condorcet loser
  • The Borda rule, Condorcet consistency and Condorcet stability
  • On the likelihood of Condorcet's profiles
  • Basic Geometry of Voting
  • Scoring run-off paradoxes for variable electorates


This page was built for publication: Condorcet vs. Borda in light of a dual majoritarian approach

Retrieved from "https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/w/index.php?title=Publication:719049&oldid=12632040"
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Printable version
Permanent link
Page information
MaRDI portal item
This page was last edited on 30 January 2024, at 10:18.
Privacy policy
About MaRDI portal
Disclaimers
Imprint
Powered by MediaWiki