Consequences, opportunities, and Arrovian impossibility theorems with consequentialist domains
From MaRDI portal
Publication:733799
DOI10.1007/s00355-008-0338-4zbMath1183.91049OpenAlexW2019503307MaRDI QIDQ733799
Publication date: 19 October 2009
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0338-4
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- Dictatorial domains in preference aggregation
- Arrovian theorems for economic domains. The case where there are simultaneously private and public goods
- A variant of non-consequentialism and its characterization
- Arrovian theorems with private alternatives domains and selfish individuals
- Characterization of domains admitting nondictatorial social welfare functions and nonmanipulable voting procedures
- The Bordes-LeBreton exceptional case
- Characterizations of consequentialism and nonconsequentialism
- Consequences, opportunities, and generalized consequentialism and non-consequentialism.
- Welfarist-consequentialism, similarity of attitudes, and Arrow's general impossibility theorem
- Ranking opportunity sets on the basis of their freedom of choice and their ability to satisfy preferences: a difficulty
- Extended preferences and freedom of choice
- Dichotomous preferences and the possibility of Arrovian social choice
This page was built for publication: Consequences, opportunities, and Arrovian impossibility theorems with consequentialist domains